Ten rules for dating my daughter shirt white house dating
While those who attend purity balls insist that they promote healthy, affectionate relationships between fathers and daughters, they are explicitly designed as events where adolescent girls are encouraged to publicly entrust their nascent sexuality to their fathers, and to use their fathers as a model for what they seek in their future spouses.
They model a father/daughter relationship based on daughterly submission and absolute fatherly authority.
Her father permits this to continue until eventually the despairing princess declares she will ‘become an ancresse’, at which point the king choreographs the happy reunion between squire and princess. It seems to me as if the king is quite happy for his daughter to spend her adolescence locked away in the palace grieving, her sexual promise unfulfilled, her love lavished fruitlessly on a grave.
For all they say she is no one’s conquest, such a claim already makes her territory.
Perhaps the daughter is best understood not a princess, but a principality; the father occupies her, and will cede ground only when she passes under the authority of another patriarch – her new husband.
I would hope that most of my readers would see why these “rules” are problematic.
Now, the desire to protect one’s offspring is a pretty natural parental response, but the way society not only permits but actively validates fathers’ preoccupation with their pubescent daughters’ sexualities reinforces the idea that the daughter belongs to the father.
[W]hen their fathers were angry or upset, they turned to their daughters for solace or comfort.